Friday 1 November 2013

Integrate. Do not Disintegrate.


‘Integrate. Do not Disintegrate’
By
J.L. Gupta


The Americans, though migrants from different parts of the world, are just Americans. No one says that he is a European, Chinese, Japanese or Korean. Nor does he call himself an Alaskan, a Californian or a New Yorker. Not one of them describes himself as a Christian, Jew or a Muslim. All are proud Americans only. The Europeans have formed the European Union and have introduced a common currency. The Germans have broken the Berlin wall. The world is breaking barriers. But we, in India, seem to be creating new ones.
In our country, every Indian is an individual. He is an Andhraite or Assamese, a Bengali, Bihari, Haryanvi, Himachali, Kashmiri, Maharashtrian, Malyali, Punjabi or a Tamilian. He is a Christian, Hindu, Jain, Muslim or a Sikh. He is an Aiyer or Aiyanger, a Bania or a Brahman, a Jat or a Jatt, a Reddy or a Rao. The list can be never ending. And each one is interested in the preservation of his distinct identity, culture and language. It is becoming difficult to find an Indian in India. Diversity has always been a stark reality. But today the nation’s unity is being threatened.
Our leaders of yester years were patriots. They had fought and won freedom.  They had worked for integration of the smaller states into the Union. The leaders of today have and  are dividing the states. They sow the seeds and then exploit the divisive propensities of the people. Just to perpetuate and preserve their own positions. To secure their small fiefdoms. For petty personal gains. And any excuse is good enough. Caste. Language. Religion. Sons of soil. Or any other. Then, they go on fast unto death. Arouse public sympathy and exploit the sentiment. Apprehending disruption of law and order, the government yields. Sometimes too readily. Is it appropriate?
Sacrificing life for national unity is understandable. It may be patriotic. But dying to force division should be totally unacceptable. Rewarding those who threaten to die for the disintegration of the state is a sacrilege. The fast is an attempt to commit suicide and must be treated as a pure and simple criminal offence. Nothing more.
Today, reorganisation of states has become a regular ritual. The parliamentary pundits perform it periodically without any delay or demur. The result is that not only India but even the Indian Union has grown numerically. While the population has gone beyond a billion and we are doing little about it, the number of states has already reached 28. And we all know the implications. Each new State means a new Governor, a new Chief Minister and ministers. And then, the cascading effect on the bureaucracy. The taxpayer alone has to bear the additional burden of the cars, kothis and salaries for all of them.  
We, as people, must realise that creation of each State only means more expense. It does not help the common man. It does not lead to more opportunities for education and employment. It does not help the needy. It serves only the greedy. The funds are largely exhausted in providing for the perks.  Almost nothing remains that may possibly percolate to the poor. The state then borrows from almost everywhere. And the people are doomed to leave behind the next generation under debt.
India is a rich country. It is rich in resources. We have fertile land. Flora and fauna. Mountains and mines. Perennial rivers. And more than a billion pair of hands. These assets are enough to take a nation to the top of the world. Japan, Korea and China are examples for us to emulate. After facing an atomic holocaust and with virtually no resources of its own, the Japanese have reached the pinnacle of economic growth. They have the capacity to face crises. A great sense of self respect. They work hard. In comparison, despite resources, we are poor. A majority of our people do not get two square meals a day. They do not have a roof over their heads. The children do not get admission in the schools. The sick cannot get a bed in hospital. The water is not potable. We have poverty in the midst of such plenty. It stares us in the face. We can no longer afford to look the other way. Our leaders do not hesitate to go around with a beggar’s bowl. Should it not hurt our sense of national pride?                                                         
Today, we really need to wage a war against illiteracy, poverty and unemployment. We have to work hard and fight against the ills of corruption, inefficiency and red tape. We must realise that every Indian deserves a dignified existence. We need hospitals and houses. Schools with adequate infrastructure. Institutions to impart vocational training to our young men so that they are able to earn their livelihood. The state must ensure certain minimum work and wage for the millions of unemployed youth. Only then the ‘right to life’ guaranteed as a fundamental right in the Constitution can become a reality.
To the masses, it does not matter whether the minister wears a blue, green or white turban. Nor are the people concerned with the colour of a politician’s cap. The common man is worried about two square meals a day. He needs a shelter to protect himself against the vagaries of weather. A bed in hospital for the sick. A seat in the school for his child. Potable water to drink. Our energies must be focussed on providing the basic necessities to the teeming and toiling masses of India. We should not be spending our time and resources on dividing the states into non-viable units of administration.
As we enter the year 2014, let us resolve to unite. Not to divide states. Integration and not disintegration should be the sole slogan.

8 comments:

  1. What a change from the last one! Though one couldn't agree more....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Couldn't agree more with the thoughts expressed here by Justice Gupta.

    Most Indians take a lot of pride in their ethnicity, religion, state etc. Jingoism permeates the national psyche. India shining! Anything bad is foreign hand! nuclear weapons! smartest people!
    Pride in one's identity is largely a good thing. But perhaps it is time now to look at how much we need to do rather than what has been accomplished over the last decade (and a lot has been, no doubt).

    In the business world, progress is tracked through metrics or key performance indicators. For nations, independent indices compiled by neutral global organizations such as UNDP, could serve a good proxy for how much development has truly taken place.

    I quote from the UNDP site below (link here http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IND.html). There is a nice chart on this site showing development over time for India.

    "Between 1980 and 2012 India's HDI rose by 1.7% annually from 0.345 to 0.554 today, which gives the country a rank of 136 out of 187 countries with comparable data. The HDI of South Asia as a region increased from 0.357 in 1980 to 0.558 today, placing India below the regional average"

    In other words, not only have we been leapfrogged by East Asian countries such as Taiwan, S Korea, and China, but we've even trailed South Asian countries such as Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

    Up for debate is how to implement the change sorely needed. Should it be the new capitalist wave - "to be rich is glorious", or should we adopt proven Western concepts based around property rights, civil liberties and free markets?
    People more qualified than I can best answer that. My guess though is that pseudo-socialism as practiced by various political parties over the last few decades is not the answer. Not in today's global economy. Not when we know that growth depends on capital and labor deployed and the former is notoriously fickle. Flowing to nations which truly offer legal protection (not just on paper), provide open competitive marketplaces and the opportunity to earn a decent return on that invested capital without the encumbrances of red tape, crumbling infrastructure or punitive taxes.


    ReplyDelete
  3. The Indian states should have never been carved on linguistic basis. Language unites and creates a national identity. Even in France where the people spoke many dialects of French, the state ruled that all people shall speak only the Parisian dialect and will otherwise be prosecuted. It may appear harsh and dictatorial. However, the leaders sometimes have to be cruel only to be kind. One may argue about the loss of culture and heritage embedded in regional languages. However for a nation as young as India, pursuit of national unity is far more important than preservation of culture. Unity in diversity is flawed. The political class focuses more on creating diversity than unity. The idea of India is not that of territorial identity but of a commonality of purpose of its people. Territorial unity is not enough.This country needs governance and not Governments and certainly not more Governments.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agree wholeheartedly Uncle. We need to think as Indians first and anything else later. States based on language are very divisive. It may have been logical at that time but I think the negative effects out wiegh the benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I fully agree with the views expressed by Justice Jawahar Lal Gupta. We Indians are an indisciplined lot. we lack nation hood. It is high time that we think and act for the unity and integrity of our country, instead of indulging in petty ( or should I say 'filthy' ) politics in the name of religion, caste, creed or region. DV Bhatia

    ReplyDelete
  6. We the people of India had solemnly resolved to uplift our country to a level hitherto unmatched. The zeal with which we started our journey seems to have dissipated. The leaders had promised the very best. The promise however has not been redeemed. A nation which is thinking of a touchdown on 'mars' is yet to provide two square meals a day to its people. Truly a quandary for We the people of India!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Vande Maatram. Its us who make the nation and we need to "give" to the nation. One has been the concept of everything- from God, soul, etc., yet we fail to comprehend it when it comes to our Nation. One is the universal state of entropy. And still we are short-sighted about our roots.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What you say is very true , sir. Our political and religious leaders have long been trying, and with some success I am afraid, to prey upon our gullibility. I am reminded of a former prime minister of India who was one day a Gujarati bahu, dressed impeccably in a Gujarati saree, and the next day the daughter of Punjab in a Punjabi salwar.
    It is largely for political reasons that hate speeches of regional political leaders, and at times of religious leaders, go unchallenged. For one does now know who in the next elections is going to be his ally.
    A K Arora

    ReplyDelete