Sunday 9 February 2014

DAME DEMOCRACY

 ‘Dame Democracy’
By
J.L. Gupta

The author of the Gettysburg address, the 16th President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, was the artist. He painted a beautiful picture when he said,  “the deaths of so many brave soldiers would not be in vain. Slavery would end as a result of the losses, the future of democracy in the world would be assured” and that "government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth". The picture was perfect. But age inevitably changes the image.

We, the People, declared India to be a ‘Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic.’ Conducted our elections. Jawahar Lal Nehru was the first PM for the longest period of 6131 days. Then, Sh. G.L. Nanda for two terms of 14 days each. After him, Sh. Lal Bahadur Shastri for 582 days from 9.6.1964 to 11.1. 1966. Then, Smt. Indira Gandhi from 24.1.1966 to 24.3. 1977 and from 14.1. 1984 to 31.10.1984 for a total of 5,831days. Then Rajiv Gandhi assumed office on the assassination of his mother on 31.10.1984. He continued till 1.12.1989 when his party lost the elections. S/SH. Morarji Desai, Charan Singh, V.P. Singh; Chandra Shekhar; P.V. Narsimha Rao; A.B. Vajpayee; H.D. Deve Gowda; I.K. Gujral adorned the office of the Prime Minister at different intervals. In May, 2004, when Smt. Sonia Gandhi was elected by the partyMPs, she nominated Dr. Manmohan Singh who had been brought to the Rajya Sabha via Assam. He has never won an election to the Lok Sabha. Thus, except for the brief intervals, the line of succession has been maintained. Now, Rahul Gandhi is being projected by the Congress party as the Prime Ministerial candidate. One wonders - Is it Rule of Democracy or Dynasty? Is it Government by the people, progeny or puppets?

 Today, the politicians and the parties are only paying lip service to the principles of democracy. The wise choose to be indifferent. Some do not even exercise the right to elect. The multitude of people prefers the pliable to the able. Inevitably, those who ‘prescribe prejudices and proscribe principles’ become leaders. They talk of principles but act on interest. Was the congress claims to be secular. Was it being Secular when it proposed to replace Dr. Kalam, a distinguished scientist, with Smt. Patil? Such actions only help the pliable rather than the able to become powerful. But the lack of competence costs the country.

Actually, a majority of the voters in India are illiterate. Why? Despite more than six decades of independence and the levy of various taxes including the ‘Education Cess?’ How many schools has the government opened after it enforced the levy and collected substantial sums? Going by the media reports, the national assets have only been frittered away in various scams and scandals.

But for the members of the dynasty, nobody could have inflicted various persons like the present day leaders on the people. Once selected, a majority of them have assumed that they are the Rulers. They are entitled to dictate terms to everyone in the country. Each and very citizen is bound to bend and bow before them. They develop a good appetite for ‘excitement and excesses.’ The people have experienced the rigors of National Emergency at the hands of such people. The trend continues. To prove themselves right, they are passing the kind of orders, which no one in the right frame of mind shall ever do. The recent directions regarding gas cylinders provide an amusing but apt example. Ironically, untold misery is being inflicted on the innocent and poor people by following wrong policies leading to virtually a total lack of governance, unbridled inflation and a policy paralysis. Then, Reservations. That too, in the name of the poor and weaker sections of the society.  Not vote banks? Some cheek. The authors of Coalgate and 2G talking of the rights of the poor. Then, there is no democracy within the congress party. No wonder, its members were sitting in Dharna at Jantar Mantar. They also raised protest in the Parliament. As a result, the proceedings were stalled. Yet, the Members draw all the allowances. It costs a fortune.

Still more, the members of Parliament are seldom seen debating issues of importance. It is long since one may have heard a clause by clause consideration of a Bill in the Parliament. Now, it is often en-masse pushing of business by voice vote.  

In our country, the good cannot normally fight an election. More than that, it happens very often that the vanquished, if blessed by a member of the dynasty, is made the winner. The ministerial berth is given to the person who had lost at the hustings. The disapproved are brought in via the back door. Through the States they may not have ever represented. The peoples’ mandate is made meaningless.

At election times, slogans like “Garibi Hatao are raised. False promises of ‘Roti, Kapda aur Makaan’ are made. None have ever been fulfilled. Failure is the only thing, the Congress party has been a success at. 

Nearer home, in Chandigarh too, the position is interesting. Till recently, the ‘City Beautiful’ was the residents’ pride and the visitors’ delight. Neat and clean. Spick and span. The Public Health Department regularly removed the garbage. There were no flies. No mosquitoes. The Parking places were free and open. The roads were well maintained. Life was simple and smooth. And then suddenly some wise men had a brain wave. They thought that ‘dame democracy’ must be brought to the town. She came. As a Municipal Council. And in a short while, the results are visible. The garbage is not removed despite payment to the contractors appointed by the Council. We have to pay for parking. Also for the Councilors calling each other corrupt. And as if this is not enough, they are busy finding more ways to subsist and sustain themselves. By taxing the electors. Even their property.

Then, watch the elected representatives on the national television. Is it not an interesting diversion from the day’s drudgery? Yes! It does give you a chance to smile. Also to cry. Often, the leaders have ‘nothing to say. But they never hesitate to prove it’. Some appear to be a ‘monumental embarrassment’ to their constituencies and countrymen. And let us remember that ‘Vice’ even if added before President does not mean a virtue.

Despite everything, an optimist should never lose hope. Hopefully, the wise shall begin to exercise their right to elect. ‘Aristocracy of merit’ shall replace the rule of mediocrity.  


Shall we ever experience it?  May I say with Lincoln - “Fondly do we hope—fervently do we pray—that this mighty scourge of war (corruption) may speedily pass away”.  And then alone we shall experience the true charm of the beautiful dame called democracy.

7 comments:

  1. A couple of quotes about government from Will Rogers (Nov 4, 1879 - Aug 15, 1935), an American cowboy, vaudeville performer, humorist, social commentator and motion picture actor. He was one of the world's best-known celebrities in the 1920s and 1930s.

    "Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for."

    "The only difference between death and taxes is that death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."

    "Alexander Hamilton started the U.S. Treasury with nothing, and that was the closest our country has ever been to being even."

    "If Stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"

    "Anything important is never left to the vote of the people. We only get to vote on some man; we never get to vote on what he is to do."

    What Is the role of a [democratic] government... to run the country, take responsibility for developing & implementing policy, and for drafting laws. From that point it starts to get gray... to protect the rights of its citizens as well as their sovereignty... to protect its citizens from enemy aggression, poverty, hard economic times, poor health, injustice, etc...

    While the extent of direct state participation in economic activities is limited by law in most countries, the government’s control and influence over business and vice versa has never been stronger or more pervasive.

    A reasonable expectation in a "democracy" might be minimal governmental interference ;-), unfortunately a market economy with a small group of people with strong individual interests in control does not make for an equitable governance model... if equity is what we understand to be the work of governments. As Will Rogers might have said, 1776 was the closest that country has ever been to that vision...

    ReplyDelete
  2. A democracy but alas only in name! Surreptitiously the republic has turned into a monarchy or rather a dictatorship with no worthy successors in sight. A government thrust upon the people. Was it ever the intention to provide a democracy? It was but promises are made to be broken. And we don't even have the option of chiseling the artifices. However we do have a ready made government...a brilliant corollary to the the uneducated and foolish 'we the people of India'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is nothing wrong and undemocratic for an iconic family to continue with its consented hold on power, thrust their scions into political arena and support them to achieve leadership roles. All families do that for their offspring to the maximum possible extent. It is no different for Nehru-Gandhi family to propel theirs. Simply criticizing and rejecting Rahul Gandhi because of his heritage is a reverse discrimination. If he is chosen by the party then he is a legitimate candidate for all probable party roles. First, he has to win elections to get into the system. Mummy can only ensure he become party’s candidate and nominee. The Indian people will ultimately, decide his fate. For him winning may be easy but even the Gandhis have on occasion lost. If he becomes the head of his party and in case the party miraculously wins majority seats in the Parliament, he very well could be the head of the government according to our parliamentary system. Often growing up in politics is a leg up in learning leadership and governance skills. Some would even contend that an elected second-generation politician may know how to avoid extreme actions.

    There is no shortage of other dynasts in Indian political domain. It is estimated that about 28 per cent of the current MPs are dynasts. The most powerful regional political dynasties are the Abdullahs, Badals, Chautalas, Karunanidhi, Patnaiks, Thackerays and Yadavs, to name a few. The BJP also has the Scindias and the Jaswant Singh family.

    Dynastic political hegemony is not an Indian innovation. Many democratic nations have spawned and nurtured dynasties. In the US, a citadel of democracy, Roosevelt, Kennedy and Bush dynasties propelled many of their progeny to become Presidents, State Governors and member of the Congress. In neighboring Bangladesh Hasina Wajed and Khaleda Zia, two tough dynast women battle for power. In Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto and Asif Zardari's son Bilawal is being groomed to carry on the dynasty of Zulfiqar Bhutto. In Singapore, whose economic progress is so widely praised, is effectively run autocratically by the Lee family. Canada has a new Trudeau on the political scene, causing concern that the son may be riding on his father’s legacy.

    Mark R. Thompson, a Hong Kong University professor says “dynasticism works in modern political systems because it appeals to notions of inherited charisma that help legitimize leadership succession and minimize organizational division". Inder Malhotra In his book Dynasties of India and Beyond said "the vocal minority's denunciation of dynasties, particularly loud in India and primarily directed against the Nehru-Gandhis, is indeed out of sync with the basic reflex of the silent majority. To the bulk of the Indian population, there seems nothing objectionable in political power passing from parent to progeny". .

    Jai Hind

    ReplyDelete
  4. I fully endorse the view that ours is a dame democracy . But can we subscribe it to one family , I'm not quite sure .....And I don't believe in the adage that we get the leaders we deserve ....because I believe we deserve better than this . For instance it was not Mrs Sonia or Mr Rahul Gandhi , it was our very own upright and honest Dr Manmohan Singh who choose to continue as PM for ten long years over a predominantlly corrupt cabinet. Any institution is as good as the people who run it ....and as long as competent, bright and honest people of our country choose to 'outsource' governance to the pliable instead of the able we will be situations where we have to pick up either a so-called 'murderer' or the 'Moron'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sad situation....no one to vote for!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those like you who feel they have “no one to vote for” now have a choice and can vote for NOTA, "none of the above". At least you will exercise your right to vote.

      Last year in September, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to register a "none of the above" vote in elections would increase voter’s participation. The judges said that this would lead to a systemic change in polls and political parties will be forced to project clean candidates. Chief Justice P Sathasivam, noted: "Democracy is all about choices and voters will be empowered by this right of negative voting". Consequently a NOTA button will be provided on the voting machine to give voters the option to choose “none of the above”.

      Although NOTA votes will be considered invalid but it will indicate to the parties the number of disillusioned constituents. Voters would decide the fate of the political parties' choices, instead of the parties deciding the voters' choices. Political parties would nominate those candidates that must be a better choice for voters than "none of the above." the candidates will work harder to keep the faith of voters.

      NOTA option introduced for the first time in the recent assembly elections made a notable impact as more than 1.5 million people exercised the option in all the four states. It made a big dent in the prospects of political parties, especially the Congress as constituencies that have been Congress bastions registered a significantly high percentage of voters opting for NOTA.

      On the down side, the NOTA will have no impact on the outcome of the polls. Even if more than 50% of voters pressed the NOTA button, the candidate who gets the maximum votes among all other candidates will be declared the winner.

      But the introduction of NOTA can be seen as a first major step towards sweeping electoral reforms in the country. Vivek ji, if the slate has only dud candidates, Go for the NOTA button.

      Jai Hind

      Delete
  6. The resignation of Kejriwal as Delhi’s chief minister was a great maneuvered performance. By relinquishing his job as CM for which he appeared to be unfitting, he can now assume the most fitting and natural role i.e., a rabble-rouser and street-level activist. According to some political pundits and game theorists, the AAP may now grab 40 seats in LS instead of forecasted 20 due to his masterstroke. Politically, it will hurt BJP and may even help the cause of Congress by eroding the BJP’s voter bank – the Hindu urban middle class.

    On the issue of Jan Lokpal bill, he achieved the aura of a martyr. He wanted to bring a strong law against corruption and both Congress and the BJP conspired to stall the bill instead of helping him. He has now exposed the similarity between two main political parties and how unashamedly both protect the corporate interests. He was forced off the cliff just two days after a FIR against Mukesh Ambani was ordered.

    Would Kerjiwal prove to be a genuine warrior or end up in a whimper like VP Singh or JP Narayan, the previous crusaders? Time will tell. Right now he remains a better choice than NM and RG.

    Jai Hind

    ReplyDelete