“Reservations
about Reservation”
BY
J.
L. Gupta
Some
days back, the media reported "Jat leaders thank Sonia for backing the
reservation demand. Hundreds of members of the Jat community on Sunday met
Congress president Sonia Gandhi and thanked her for her role in getting the
government to ask the Backward Classes Commission to take a quick call on
granting them reservation in central government jobs."
Last
week, a Daily from Chandigarh carried another report - "Captain writes to
PM on Jat quota." The report said, "Former Chief Minister and
President of the All India Jat Maha Sabha, Capt. Amarinder Singh has written to
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh demanding that the Cabinet decision on providing
reservation to the Jats under the other backward classes (OBC) category be
extended to the States of Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir, Maharashtra and Andhra
Pradesh too. In a statement, he said "the reservation should be based on
caste and not religion as Sikh and Muslim Jats have been excluded from the
benefit in several states." The report also indicates that ruling SAD is
being blamed for its failure to grant reservation to Jats in Punjab.
The
reports clearly indicate that an effort is being made to grant the benefit of
reservation to Jats. The object of the government may be to please the
community and to get votes. Still, the question that arises is -- "can the
Government proceed to make reservations solely on the basis of caste or even
religion under the Constitution? And more importantly- Have the reservations
made thus far really helped in achieving the desired objective of improving the
lot of the weaker sections of the society?
Justice
and Equality are the promises that the constitution makes to the people of
India. In the preamble, there is a resolve to secure to all citizens -- Justice
-- Social, Economic and Political. Also Equality of Status and Opportunity. The
preamble lays down the goal. It embodies the policy. The state is under a duty
to work in a way that all get justice. All are given equal opportunity so as to
become equal in status. Article 14 could have been enough to achieve this
objective, yet, the founding fathers chose to make specific provisions in the
form of Articles 15 and 16.
Article 15 prohibits
discrimination only on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
However, Cl.(4) provides that “Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of
article 29 shall prevent the state from making any special provision for the
advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or
for the scheduled castes and the scheduled Tribes.” Furthermore, Cl.(5)
provides that “nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of
article 19 shall prevent the state from making any special provision, by law,
for the advancement of any socially and
educationally backward classes of citizens or for the scheduled castes or the
scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions relate to admission to
educational institutions including private educational institutions whether
aided or unaided by the state, other than the minority educational institutions
referred to in clause (1) of article 30.
A
perusal of the above provision shows that the state is debarred from making
discrimination only on the basis of caste or religion etc. However, it has been
inter alia provided that the bar shall not apply to the provision for the
advancement of or admission of candidates belonging to ' any socially and
educationally backward classes of citizens.’
Are
the Jats, as a class, socially and educationally backward? Has the government
conducted a study and found as a fact that the Jats are socially and
educationally backward so as to deserve a preferential treatment? It appears
that some time back the request of Jats for grant of reservation was declined
by the government. Why and how has the sudden change occurred?
Actually,
reservations have been in vogue for a long time. The people have been given the
benefit of reservation. Merit has been sacrificed. The desired objective has
still not been achieved. It is so despite the fact that the Constitution has
been amended several times and additions have been made to the list of categories
of persons for whom the benefit of reservation shall be available. The
ever-increasing list is indicative of the fact that the desired objective has
remained elusive; the lot of the backward class of citizens has not improved
and that it is imperative to find some new method. What can it be?
Undeniably,
there is poverty. It is also correct that the poor cannot send their children
to good schools and provide facilities available to the more fortunate sections
of society. In this situation, the experiment of reservation having failed, it
appears to be more appropriate to adopt a different form of affirmative action.
Measures for equalising the un-equals are permissible. The government having
levied ‘education cess’ is under a duty to make Art. 21A a reality. It should
provide good facilities in all schools. All children, irrespective of their
economic position should be admitted to good schools. The children would have
the equality of opportunity in getting education. At the end of the course of
studies, the performance and not caste should determine their future. In this
way, the lot of the poor children would improve in as much as they would have
studied in good schools; enjoyed all those facilities which were available to
all the other children studying with them. It would help achieve the
constitutional goal of equality and justice. A good environment, congenial
atmosphere and the opportunity for all students to rub shoulders together would
by itself lead to a more harmonious growth of personality. This should help the
members of weaker sections of society.
The
Caste system has proved to be a curse in India. Let us move from mediocrity to
merit. If we recognise merit, our performance should improve. While reservation
induces a complacence, or laid back attitude; competition impels performance
and improves quality. Still more, reservations on the basis of caste encourage
fissiparous tendencies. It also encourages other sections to raise similar
demands. These need to be curbed.
Even
otherwise, Jats have been the fighting arm of India. They have ruled over
States. Held positions of responsibility. How can they be collectively branded
as socially and educationally backward? Before taking any further steps or
finalising the decision, a proper enquiry into the matter is essential. A click
on the Internet.. shows that the state of Patiala was ruled by Maharaja
Bhupinder Singh. The former Chief Minister of Punjab is his grandson. Can the
members of the ruling elite be treated as socially and educationally backward?
Still more, the Internet shows that very eminent persons who have played a
vital role in the country have come from the Jat community. Illustratively, the
name of Ch. Charan Singh may be mentioned. He was the Prime Minister of India.
Similarly, Mr. Balram Jakhar was the Speaker of the parliament. Mr. P.S. Badal,
C.M. Punjab and Mr. B,S.Hooda the C.M. Haryana are Jats. Various other persons
have attained positions of responsibility in different fields and services. All
these facts need to be examined before taking a decision.
The best asset of a nation is its
people. A nation can prosper only when it is built on the foundations of good
education and a sound moral character. As a nation, we must realise that
whatever we dump into human minds would yield more than any number of steel
mills. Educated and enlightened men and women are essential for national
progress. Education must receive the priority it rightfully deserves.
Secondly, we must ask ourselves:
what keeps the majority of our people poor? We have resources. We have
manpower. And yet the majority of us live below the poverty line. Why? In one
line, the answer is: For the poor procreation is the only recreation. The
result is a population explosion. A crisis of numbers. We continue to multiply
rapidly. In one way, every new member in a family is an additional earning
hand. But we do not realise that he is also an additional mouth to feed. He is
one more illiterate'. It is imperative that we control the numerical growth of
people. We must by the process of education, through the media and in every
possible way make it clear to the people that you will add to the numbers at
your own cost. The nation shall not bear the burden. Henceforth, a person with
more than one child should not be eligible for a government job or an elected
office. If he gets a second child after joining government service, he should
not be eligible for any further promotion. No person with more than one child
should be eligible for any concession or benefit of reservation. Undoubtedly,
the measure would be unpopular. But the choice is between patriotism and
populism. The government should not hesitate to sacrifice the support from a
sizeable vote bank, if it wants the good of the people.
Thirdly, we must develop a work culture.
We must realise that ‘individual idleness can only lead to national decay.’ The
national progress can only be the sum total of individual industry. Honest and
hard work alone paves the way to success. Labour alone can produce wealth and
prosperity.
We have the example of Japan. It is
the only nation in the world which has faced the catastrophe of an atomic
holocaust. Its people are the only natural resource. And yet within a short
period of time, it has become one of the greatest economic powers in the world.
Hard and honest labour is the secret of its success. We must emulate this
example.
Lastly, we must realise that the
Constitution not only guarantees fundamental rights but also imposes
fundamental duties. Chapter IV-A was added to the Constitution by the
42nd Amendment in 1976. It makes a provision in the Constitution in line with
Article 29(I) of the Declaration of Human Rights. It has been, inter alia,
provided that "it shall be the duty of every citizen of India to strive
towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity, so
that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement." If we realise this
single duty and perform it to the best of our ability,-the nation of more than
a billion people can surely look forward to a brighter future. The ideal of
social and economic justice can then become a reality for the present
generation. Will this be our New Year Resolution? Yes! Let us begin the year
2014 with this firm resolve.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat thought process of a great mind indeed . Had every citizen of this great nation conscientiously thought of his/her fundamental duties, we would have strived much better as a nation.
ReplyDeleteWonderful piece indeed. Makes one wonder, is this what the Founding Fathers of this Nation imagined for us?
ReplyDeleteVery well written and spot on. I sometimes wonder is a true functional democracy is possible in poor nations where the voting public can be swayed by promises of personal gain with no regard to national interests. It seems everyone is looking for their own and often times short term interests.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree. Reservation in India has become a tool to garner votes and the whole scheme needs to be re-examined. Because of so many benefits conferred on the so called backward classes, so many groups now want to be classified as backward classes. Even the Jats in Punjab have been clamouring for this status. Instead of moving forward and reducing dependence on reservation, the Government has, in fact, increased it by introducing reservation in promotions also. Its completely retrograde and discourages merit and motivation(The exodus of Tamilian Brahmins abroad is a perfect example of that). For one reservation to the second generation of SC/ST and OBC should be completely stopped. There is absolutely no logic in that. Once a family has lifted itself out of its disadvantaged situation, there is no sense in giving the same benefits to the second generation. It is not only unfair to general population, but also to other disadvantaged people who could have used that quota. Another way could be to provide the benefit of reservation once in a lifetime...like a ticket which can be used once...either for a college seat, or for a job. Once used that nothing else for the lifetime. There must not be reservation at every step. In the present system, a backward(who may not be backward to begin with) can get the benefit of reservation to get admission in a college, then to land a job, and then to get promotion also. It is completely twisted and distorts the merit system.
ReplyDeleteAn issue which has entailed innumerable discussions without bearing the fruit. An issue which has lead to disharmony, immolations, divisive politics and a lot of heart burn unnecessarily. The basic policy adopted for reservations has been warped. The Supreme Court of India did in its wisdom attempt to streamline it by asking for reservations to be made on the basis of the economic condition of the people but such a progressive attitude was unacceptable. The governments over the long span of 66 years have been unable to identify the real people who deserve reservation. It is indeed ironical that the people who actually need it, never benefit from this policy. Moreover the creamy layer which technically needs to compete with the general category, is able to avail the benefit. The result is that the reservation policy seems to have been drafted and amended time and again only to suit the requirements of the selected few...those who can make or break the governments. An issue which has languished only in the books of the academicians. Do we still dare to hope for a semblance of positivity?
ReplyDelete